mirror of
				https://github.com/PabloMK7/citra.git
				synced 2025-10-31 13:50:03 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	Shader: RCP and RSQ computes only the 1st component
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									16f39aa452
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						fa552f11ef
					
				
					 2 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -221,13 +221,12 @@ void RunInterpreter(UnitState<Debug>& state) { | ||||||
|             { |             { | ||||||
|                 Record<DebugDataRecord::SRC1>(state.debug, iteration, src1); |                 Record<DebugDataRecord::SRC1>(state.debug, iteration, src1); | ||||||
|                 Record<DebugDataRecord::DEST_IN>(state.debug, iteration, dest); |                 Record<DebugDataRecord::DEST_IN>(state.debug, iteration, dest); | ||||||
|  |                 float24 rcp_res = float24::FromFloat32(1.0f / src1[0].ToFloat32()); | ||||||
|                 for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) { |                 for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) { | ||||||
|                     if (!swizzle.DestComponentEnabled(i)) |                     if (!swizzle.DestComponentEnabled(i)) | ||||||
|                         continue; |                         continue; | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|                     // TODO: Be stable against division by zero!
 |                     dest[i] = rcp_res; | ||||||
|                     // TODO: I think this might be wrong... we should only use one component here
 |  | ||||||
|                     dest[i] = float24::FromFloat32(1.0f / src1[i].ToFloat32()); |  | ||||||
|                 } |                 } | ||||||
|                 Record<DebugDataRecord::DEST_OUT>(state.debug, iteration, dest); |                 Record<DebugDataRecord::DEST_OUT>(state.debug, iteration, dest); | ||||||
|                 break; |                 break; | ||||||
|  | @ -238,13 +237,12 @@ void RunInterpreter(UnitState<Debug>& state) { | ||||||
|             { |             { | ||||||
|                 Record<DebugDataRecord::SRC1>(state.debug, iteration, src1); |                 Record<DebugDataRecord::SRC1>(state.debug, iteration, src1); | ||||||
|                 Record<DebugDataRecord::DEST_IN>(state.debug, iteration, dest); |                 Record<DebugDataRecord::DEST_IN>(state.debug, iteration, dest); | ||||||
|  |                 float24 rsq_res = float24::FromFloat32(1.0f / sqrt(src1[0].ToFloat32())); | ||||||
|                 for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) { |                 for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) { | ||||||
|                     if (!swizzle.DestComponentEnabled(i)) |                     if (!swizzle.DestComponentEnabled(i)) | ||||||
|                         continue; |                         continue; | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|                     // TODO: Be stable against division by zero!
 |                     dest[i] = rsq_res; | ||||||
|                     // TODO: I think this might be wrong... we should only use one component here
 |  | ||||||
|                     dest[i] = float24::FromFloat32(1.0f / sqrt(src1[i].ToFloat32())); |  | ||||||
|                 } |                 } | ||||||
|                 Record<DebugDataRecord::DEST_OUT>(state.debug, iteration, dest); |                 Record<DebugDataRecord::DEST_OUT>(state.debug, iteration, dest); | ||||||
|                 break; |                 break; | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
|  | @ -496,9 +496,10 @@ void JitCompiler::Compile_MOV(Instruction instr) { | ||||||
| void JitCompiler::Compile_RCP(Instruction instr) { | void JitCompiler::Compile_RCP(Instruction instr) { | ||||||
|     Compile_SwizzleSrc(instr, 1, instr.common.src1, SRC1); |     Compile_SwizzleSrc(instr, 1, instr.common.src1, SRC1); | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|     // TODO(bunnei): RCPPS is a pretty rough approximation, this might cause problems if Pica
 |     // TODO(bunnei): RCPSS is a pretty rough approximation, this might cause problems if Pica
 | ||||||
|     // performs this operation more accurately. This should be checked on hardware.
 |     // performs this operation more accurately. This should be checked on hardware.
 | ||||||
|     RCPPS(SRC1, R(SRC1)); |     RCPSS(SRC1, R(SRC1)); | ||||||
|  |     SHUFPS(SRC1, R(SRC1), _MM_SHUFFLE(0, 0, 0, 0)); // XYWZ -> XXXX
 | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|     Compile_DestEnable(instr, SRC1); |     Compile_DestEnable(instr, SRC1); | ||||||
| } | } | ||||||
|  | @ -506,9 +507,10 @@ void JitCompiler::Compile_RCP(Instruction instr) { | ||||||
| void JitCompiler::Compile_RSQ(Instruction instr) { | void JitCompiler::Compile_RSQ(Instruction instr) { | ||||||
|     Compile_SwizzleSrc(instr, 1, instr.common.src1, SRC1); |     Compile_SwizzleSrc(instr, 1, instr.common.src1, SRC1); | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|     // TODO(bunnei): RSQRTPS is a pretty rough approximation, this might cause problems if Pica
 |     // TODO(bunnei): RSQRTSS is a pretty rough approximation, this might cause problems if Pica
 | ||||||
|     // performs this operation more accurately. This should be checked on hardware.
 |     // performs this operation more accurately. This should be checked on hardware.
 | ||||||
|     RSQRTPS(SRC1, R(SRC1)); |     RSQRTSS(SRC1, R(SRC1)); | ||||||
|  |     SHUFPS(SRC1, R(SRC1), _MM_SHUFFLE(0, 0, 0, 0)); // XYWZ -> XXXX
 | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|     Compile_DestEnable(instr, SRC1); |     Compile_DestEnable(instr, SRC1); | ||||||
| } | } | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue